Home
News
Community
Opinion
Schools
Society
Sports
Business
Bon Appetit
Columnists
Religion Directory
Classifieds
DBAs
Community Links
About La Cañada
About Us
Contact Us

Archive

Our City
Our Schools
Our Sports
Our Kids

Letters Policy.....

Letters to the editor should be no longer than 300 words. All letters sent to the Outlook become property of the Outlook and may be edited and condensed for any reason. Letters must be submitted by one person only and be accompanied by a valid phone number. No pseudonyms or initials may be used. Deadline for letters is Tuesday at noon for the following Thursday edition. Send submissions by mail to LCF Outlook, Attn.: Letters to the Editor, P.O. Box 578, La Cañada Flintridge, CA 91012 or by fax to (818) 790-7260. To send letters via e-mail, write "Letter to the Editor" in the subject line and send to outlooknews@earthlink.net
 

Updated Sept 18th, 2008

Letters to the Editor


McCain’s ‘Straight Talk Express’

This election, like most, has included stretching the truth by both sides. But for the last few weeks, the “Straight Talk Express” has been anything but. I am reluctant to use the “L” word, but to repeatedly say something that is obviously false is a problem.

In the last few weeks, McCain’s campaign has repeatedly claimed Obama wants to teach comprehensive sex education to kindergartners when, actually, Obama supported age-appropriate “beware of strangers” education. McCain’s ads also say Obama would raise taxes on the middle class when, actually, Obama’s plan would lower taxes on the middle class.

The claims by Palin are equally inappropriate. She claimed she proved her disdain of pork spending by saying “thanks, but no thanks” to Congress regarding the “Bridge to Nowhere.” Yet she publicly supported the bridge before it became an embarrassment. She claims Alaska supplies 20% of the energy consumed in the U.S., when it is really 3.5%. It’s becoming clear that McCain and Palin would rather lose their integrity than risk losing the election.

McCain is describing his ticket as being about change. Yet his positions on taxes, energy, Social Security, foreign policy, the Iraq war, Supreme Court justices and Rove-style politics are extremely similar to the current administration’s.

A recent analysis showed that based on the cost per household to build solar systems, we could power over 80% of the houses in the U.S. for less than the cost of the Iraq war. With the world currently pulling over 1,000 barrels of oil out of the Earth every second of every minute, of every hour of every day, it should be obvious this can’t last. Our being less dependent on oil would make us and the world a safer place. Tackling alternative energy projects versus drilling to get a tiny bit more oil from Alaska is change I can believe in and is consistent with Obama’s vision.

I can, with difficulty, understand some people favoring the Bush/McCain positions, but to claim the McCain ticket is about change when contrasted with Obama’s is more than just a stretch. You might not agree with all of Obama’s positions, but he has a farsighted vision that will be better for America and, thus far in this campaign, he has demonstrated far more integrity.

Brent McWatters
La Cañada Flintridge

 

Privacy policy: No user-specific information is collected from visitors to this website.

Website Maintained by

Earth Oasis Computers

Questions or comments about our site?
Click here to contact our Webmaster