Home
News
Community
Opinion
Schools
Society
Sports
Business
Bon Appetit
Columnists
Religion Directory
Classifieds
DBAs
Community Links
About La Cañada
About Us
Contact Us

Archive

Our City
Our Schools
Our Sports
Our Kids

Letters Policy.....

Letters to the editor should be no longer than 300 words. All letters sent to the Outlook become property of the Outlook and may be edited and condensed for any reason. Letters must be submitted by one person only and be accompanied by a valid phone number. No pseudonyms or initials may be used. Deadline for letters is Tuesday at noon for the following Thursday edition. Send submissions by mail to LCF Outlook, Attn.: Letters to the Editor, P.O. Box 578, La Cañada Flintridge, CA 91012 or by fax to (818) 790-7260. To send letters via e-mail, write "Letter to the Editor" in the subject line and send to outlooknews@earthlink.net
 

Updated Oct 9th, 2008

Letters to the Editor


Marriage Proposition Controversy

As one whose name was listed in the ad in favor of Proposition 8 published in The Outlook, I disagree with the allegations of intolerance and bigotry asserted by Julie Abbott in her letter to the editor (Oct 2 issue).

Oftentimes we do not appreciate the value of what we have until we lose it. Marriage and family have been under assault for many years and striving to preserve the unique role of mother and father is worth protecting. I cannot imagine what my four children would be without the influence of my wife. Likewise, I strive to set an example for my daughters and son by the way I treat my wife, hoping they will, in kind, desire to establish a similar relationship as they seek a spouse and start a family.

The judicial modification of marriage not only unnecessarily takes away the long held definition of marriage, but also opens the door for confusing and deceiving future generations in the years to come. Never has so much been taken away from so many, both living and those yet to come, so that so few can call their union a marriage.

I have friends and colleagues who are attracted to the same sex. I harbor no ill will or bigotry towards them. Provision has been made for them to enjoy their union; however, there is no need to open the door for traditional marriage to be anything other than a man and a woman providing a home with the benefits of a mother and a father.

I hope we can all carefully reflect on the wisdom of traditional marriage as we have known it and the role it has played in our society. For this reason I am in favor of Proposition 8.

Charles Woodhouse
La Cañada Flintridge


...And the Opposing View

I am totally outraged at the full color ads that you are currently running in your publication in support of Proposition 8. This proposition is one of the most bigoted acts to ever pollute our lives and the pages of The Outlook.

I was born overseas and understand oppression and racism very well, as there were many times that I was judged based on my ethnicity or the color of my skin. When I moved to Los Angeles in the late ’70s, I loved the diversity and the freedom to be who you are without the government telling you how you should live your life; a concept foreign in many other counties, but one that forms the foundation of our great country.

Now in 2008, we have the Mormons trying to tell us how to run our political system in order to oppress another group of people that they consider inferior. How is this any different than the Jim Crow laws that plagued our country between 1876 and 1965.

If you find yourself supporting Prop 8, it is time to wake up and open your mind. Prop 8 is not about protecting the sanctity of marriage; where is the sanctity when over 50% of all marriages now end in divorce? And the fact that 1 in 5 never-married women ages 15 to 44 are single mothers and 20% of those are raising three or more children alone.

On the other hand, you have two people, who want to form a family and many of these couples have or want children and they have the ability to provide a loving and supportive home. Gay couples will not make gay babies.

Most of us in California are fairly educated. Do these ads really think that they will convince an educated public that a family with two loving, same-sex parents is worse than being raised by some of these so-called straight parents other there? How about all the children who are in the “system” and will be on their own at age 18 with no parent to guide them in life? Many will end up in a life of crime. How many of these children will be better off with two parents, gay or straight?

This really is not a gay issue; it is an issue of denying a group of people their basic civil liberties guaranteed to all of us by our Constitution. Let’s finally put all the bigoted attitudes to bed and allow everyone to live their lives as they see fit, without “Big Brother” and the religious right wing telling us how to live our “free” lives.

No on Proposition 8. Anything else would be Un-American.

Jirayr Boynerian
Glendale

 

Privacy policy: No user-specific information is collected from visitors to this website.

Website Maintained by

Earth Oasis Computers

Questions or comments about our site?
Click here to contact our Webmaster