Home
News
Community
Opinion
Schools
Society
Sports
Business
Bon Appetit
Columnists
Religion Directory
Classifieds
DBAs
Community Links
About La Cañada
About Us
Contact Us

Archive

Our City
Our Schools
Our Sports
Our Kids

More News...

 

Updated June 11th, 2009

City Weighs New License,
Fee for Tobacco Retailers

By ERIC NOLAND
The Outlook

Barely two months after being crowned Miss La Cañada Flintridge of 2007, Liah Zirler was looking to buy a pack of smokes. She was only 16 at the time, so she was prepared to lie about whether she had ID and lie about her birth date.

At store after store in La Cañada Flintridge, a clerk would place the cigarettes on the counter in front of her, look furtively around and quote her the price.

Actually, Zirler had no use whatsoever for cigarettes. She was part of a clever sting, in which underage local kids tested the compliance of retailers licensed to sell tobacco. And the results were startling: Of 17 such businesses locally, eight were willing to sell to the kids.

That survey, followed by two years of deliberations by the city’s Youth Council, has led to a proposed new ordinance in which the city would add a layer of regulation for tobacco merchants. The City Council will have a first reading of the measure on Monday night, could pass the ordinance as early as July 6 and require the license from local retailers — at a fee that has yet to be fixed — by the first week of August, according to City Manager Mark Alexander.

And some business owners are not the least bit pleased. “What are you telling me? They’re going to put in new fees?” said Charlie Kamar, owner of the Union 76 station at Alta Canyada Road. “Typical: big government, little government.”

“That’s outrageous. Unbelievable,” said Hayel Barakat, owner of Ocean View Liquor. “It’s just a license to steal money from retailers. We’ve already been taxed twice or three times. The City of La Cañada is just making it harder for those businesses to survive.”

John Payton of the La Cañada Liquor Store was more muted in his reaction, but no less exasperated. “Businesses right now are struggling in general,” he said. “I know we’re down. I’ve talked to others who are down. I don’t want to say ‘bigger fish to fry,’ but there are other issues in this town. Go down Foothill Boulevard; you can count the number of empty businesses on two hands.”

Proponents of the tobacco retailers’ license insist that the fee will be used solely to administer the licensing program — which will include sending out “youth decoys” in the future to determine whether cigarettes are being sold to minors.

“We want the fee to be as modest as possible,” said City Councilman Don Voss, liaison to the Youth Council. “The point is not to raise revenue, it’s to control the sale of tobacco.”

Other California communities that adopted tobacco retail licenses in the wake of similar underagebuying stings set their annual fees between $150 and $500, but the local tobacco merchants contacted by The Outlook said that even something at the low end of that range would be a hardship in these tough economic straits.

The campaign stems from the alarming events of two years ago. The Youth Purchase Survey has been conducted in towns all over the state since 2003, and was administered locally with the help of Glendale Adventist Medical Center’s Community Services office. In La Cañada Flintridge, 47.1% of the tobacco retailers were willing to sell to the kids — one of the highest figures recorded in Los Angeles County since the program began, and more than three times the statewide survey rate of 13.3% registered the year before.

Zirler, now 19, said she was stunned by what she found. “Most of the places either just went through the motions of seeing my ID because of the (security) cameras,” she said. “Other places asked me how old I was, and I could just lie.”

At one establishment, flustered, she blurted out a birth date that made her only 17, with a birthday two weeks away. The clerk, she said, responded, “OK. That’s close enough.”

Everyone involved with the survey emphasized that the kids did not actually make purchases — no one wanted to have an underage person break one law to catch an adult breaking another. So, just as the sale was about to be consummated, the would-be buyers would remark that their money was out in the car and leave the store for good.

Voss agreed that the data from the 2007 survey is “a little stale, but the indication we get is that from a statewide and local perspective, the trend is still the same.”

Jeff Tobias, chairman of the Youth Council, agrees. If a minor wishes to buy tobacco in La Cañada Flintridge, he said, “It’s not hard to do, from what I’ve heard. Not a lot of my friends smoke cigarettes, so I don’t see it much over at Flintridge Prep, but I do see it all over La Cañada High School and the city in general. It doesn’t appear to be the most difficult thing to do.”

Zirler added: “I think it’s still a problem. I know some people who have gotten cigarettes by just lying, or (going to) a place that doesn’t card. They’ll say, ‘Go to that gas station over there, they don’t card.’ ”

The local retailers interviewed by The Outlook — each of which insisted it complies strictly — note that there is already a layer of state regulation. They pay a fee to the state Board of Equalization for the right to sell tobacco products.

But Guadulesa Rivera, community advocate for Glendale Adventist Medical Center — and someone who participated in the Youth Purchase Survey here — maintains that state compliance checks are inadequate. “Most times, they’re checking to see if the retailer has the proper stamp, to make sure they’re paying the state tax,” she said. “There’s enough funding to check about 3 percent of retailers in any given year (in underage stings). When you have a local ordinance, that money stays in the city, and you can gear compliance checks to your own local needs.”

A survey conducted by the Center for Tobacco Policy & Organizing found that the local ordinances produce dramatic results, causing underage sales to plummet. For example, Coachella experienced a drop from 69% to 11%, Desert Hot Springs from 48% to 4%, Pasadena from 20% to 0%.

“I’m not against it,” said Payton of La Cañada Liquor. “But in the framework of where we are right now from a financial standpoint, it’s not the time to be taxing businesses. I know in my store we check everything.

“And if they’re going to do this, I want them to report the ones that complied. If I’m going to pay the $150, and I get a clean bill of health, I want there to be something that says this is a clean store.”

 

Privacy policy: No user-specific information is collected from visitors to this website.

Website Maintained by

Earth Oasis Computers

Questions or comments about our site?
Click here to contact our Webmaster